Towards an Argumentative Dialogue System
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this work we propose a scheme for an Argumentative Dialogue System that allows a user to discuss a certain topic with a virtual agent using natural language. Starting from an agent vs agent case, we address the optimization of the agent strategy by formulating the problem as a Stochastic Game and show that this formalism generally allows the inclusion of additional strategical moves that are not based on the content of the argument. In a second step we propose our approach for the Natural Language Understanding of arguments by combining recent results of argumentation mining with a keyword-based mapping.
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Dynamic Assessment of Toulmin Model through Teacher- and Collective-Scaffolding on Argument Structure and Argumentative Writing Achievement of Iranian EFL Learners
Considering the paramount importance of writing logical arguments for college students, this study investigated the effect of dynamic assessment (DA) of Toulmin model through teacher- and collective-scaffolding on argument structure and overall quality of argumentative essays of Iranian EFL university learners. In so doing, 45 male and female Iranian EFL learners taking part in the study were r...
متن کاملDeep Linguistic Processing with GETARUNS for Spoken Dialogue Understanding
In this paper we will present work carried out to scale up the system for text understanding called GETARUNS, and port it to be used in dialogue understanding. The current goal is that of extracting automatically argumentative information in order to build argumentative structure. The long term goal is using argumentative structure to produce automatic summarization of spoken dialogues. Very mu...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Annotation Schema for Meeting Discussions
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken from meeting records. We first propose a meeting content model where conversational acts are interpreted with respect to their argumentative force and their role in building the argumentative structure of the meeting discussion. Argumentation in dialogue describes the way participants take part ...
متن کاملTowards Model Checking Argumentative Dialogues with Emotional Reasoning (extended abstract)
In the paper, we show a formal model for a dialogue game in which players can perform actions representing locutions like claim, question, concede as well as locutions which have a greater emotional charge like scold or nod. We define a protocol for dialogues in which participants have emotional skills and then give an interpreted system for them. Finally, we propose an extension of CTL logic w...
متن کاملKnowing When To Bargain - The roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogue
In this paper two formal dialectic systems are described, a persuasion protocol (PP0) and a negotiation protocol (NP0), together with a method for shifting from an instance of a persuasion dialogue to an instance of a negotiation dialogue. The rationale for this kind of shift is explored in the context of the fallacy of bargaining. Such a dialectical shift is proposed as a valuable way to enabl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017